History in more context

De Stijl –


The Dutch artistic movement founded in 1917 to 1931 the movement proposed ultimate simplicity and abstraction through which they could express a Utopian idea of harmony and order.
Early history and political movements


From the flurry of new art movements that followed the Impressionists' revolutionary new perception of painting, Cubism arose in the early twentieth century as an important and influential new direction. In the Netherlands, too, there was interest in this "new art."
However, because the Netherlands remained neutral in World War I, Dutch artists were not able to leave the country after 1914 and were thus effectively isolated from the international art world—and in particular, from Paris, which was its centre at that time.
During that period, painter Theo van Doesburg started looking for other artists to set up a journal and start an art movement. Van Doesburg was also a writer, poet, and critic, who had been more successful writing about art than working as an independent artist. Quite adept at making new contacts due to his flamboyant personality and outgoing nature, he had many useful connections in the art world.



Other movements during the De Stijl movement

Around 1921, the group's character started to change. From the time of van Doesburg's association with Bauhaus, other influences started playing a role. These influences were mainly Malevich and Russian Constructivism, to which not all members agreed. In 1924, Mondrian broke with the group after van Doesburg proposed the theory of elementarism, proposing that the diagonal line was more vital than the horizontal and the vertical. In addition, the De Stijl group acquired many new "members." Dadaist influences, such as I.K. Bonset's poetry and Aldo Camini's "antiphilosophy," generated controversy as well. Only after van Doesburg's death was it revealed that Bonset and Camini were two of his pseudonyms.



Founding of De Stijl


Around 1915, Van Doesburg started meeting the artists who would eventually become the founders of the journal. He first met Piet Mondrian at an exhibition in the Amsterdam Stedelijk Museum. Mondrian, who had moved to Paris in 1912 (and there, changed his name from "Mondriaan"), had been visiting the Netherlands when war broke out. He could not return to Paris, and was staying in the artists' community of Laren, where he met Bart van der Leck and regularly saw M.H.J. Schoenmaekers. In 1915, Schoenmaekers published Het nieuwe wereldbeeld (The New Image of the World), followed in 1916 by Beginselen der beeldende wiskunde (Principles of Plastic Mathematics). These two publications would greatly influence Mondrian and other members of De Stijl.

Van Doesburg also knew J.J.P. Oud and the Hungarian artist Vilmos Huszàr. In 1917, the cooperation of these artists, together with the poet Anthony Kok, resulted in the founding of De Stijl. The young architect Gerrit Rietveld joined the group in 1918. 


During those first few years, the group was still relatively homogeneous, although Van der Leck left in 1918 due to artistic differences of opinion. Manifestos were being published, signed by all members. The social and economic circumstances of the time formed an important source of inspiration for their theories, and their ideas about architecture were heavily influenced by Berlage and Frank Lloyd Wright.




Members of the group:

Painters

Theo van Doesburg (1883–1931)

Piet Mondrian (1872–1944)

Vilmos Huszár (1884–1960)

Bart van der Leck (1876–1958)



Architects


Gerrit Rietveld (1888–1964)

Robert van 't Hoff (1887–1979)

J.J.P. Oud (1890–1963). 





The Manifesto: 









Principles: 

The name De Stijl is supposedly derived from Gottfried Semper's Der Stil in den technischen und tektonischen Künsten oder Praktische Ästhetik (1861–3), which Curl suggests was mistakenly believed to advocate materialism and functionalism. In general, De Stijl proposed ultimate simplicity and abstraction, both in architecture and painting, by using only straight horizontal and vertical lines and rectangular forms. Furthermore, their formal vocabulary was limited to the primary colours, red, yellow, and blue, and the three primary values, black, white, and grey. The works avoided symmetry and attained aesthetic balance by the use of opposition. This element of the movement embodies the second meaning of stijl: “a post, jamb or support”; this is best exemplified by the construction of crossing joints, most commonly seen in carpentry.

In many of the group's three-dimensional works, vertical and horizontal lines are positioned in layers or planes that do not intersect, thereby allowing each element to exist independently and unobstructed by other elements. This feature can be found in the Rietveld Schröder House and the Red and Blue Chair. 



Influences:

De Stijl was influenced by Cubist painting as well as by the mysticism and the ideas about "ideal" geometric forms (such as the "perfect straight line") in the neoplatonic philosophy of mathematician M.H.J. Schoenmaekers. The works of De Stijl would influence the Bauhaus style and the international style of architecture as well as clothing and interior design. However, it did not follow the general guidelines of an “ism” (Cubism, Futurism, Surrealism), nor did it adhere to the principles of art schools like the Bauhaus; it was a collective project, a joint enterprise.


Designs and weblinks








http://www.huntfor.com/arthistory/C20th/destijl.htm



Quotes


"…The pure plastic vision should build a new society, in the same way that in art it has built a new plasticism."

(Taken from the magazine called De Stijl, published between 1917 and 1932)



His article, "The New Plastic in Painting", best expresses their ideas for reduction of form and simplistic abstraction: "The new plastic art...can only be based on the abstraction of all form and color, i.e. the straight line and the clearly defined primary color" (Lemoine, 1987, p.29).

Okay that's done and dusted now back to historical research aaarrggghhh 


Email template

To whom it may concern
Dear (name)
Dear sir/madam


Hello, 
My name is Natatsha Ruddock, I am currently a 3rd year student at the pronowed University of the Arts London. I am emailing you as I require your help with my final year project.
The project is about Modernism as I believe that it is still useful and used in today's designs however others believe that it has failed it was just a movement moving on to the next.   


As you are the professional I am turning to you for help with my project. As my ideas are good but as a student I would like your advice and help.
I am wanting to produce pieces that at familiarised with Modernists designs during the 1950's mainly looking at the Swiss Style as I am influenced and inspired by artists such as Armin Hofman, Emil Ruder, Paul Rand, Josef Muller-Brockmann and many others.


Looking at work you have designed, collected, referenced I thought you would be the best person or company to ask. I hope you can answer the questions below and please do add more if you can as your answers would be very much appreciated. 
I was also wondering if it would be possible to arrange a meeting between yourself and I perhaps to look at work/s you have created as it may help with my final pieces. 
I understand you may be extremely busy but I would be entirely grateful. 
As there isn't much time left to my final hand in I please ask of you to reply as soon as you can.


Thank you very much for reading my email.  


Please do contact me at - 
email address: natasharuddock88@gmail.com
Blog address: http://amodernistsina21stcentury.blogspot.com
Telephone no: 07951729106
Skype: Natasha Ruddock


Thanks again
Yours Sincerely 
Natasha Ruddock

Firstly

I think I should email these question first as it may take a while before I get any response.

Possible questions:

Why do you have an interest or career in modernism - art and design?

Why have you chosen the path to be or work like a modernists designer?

What do you like and dislike about modernist art and design?

Who influences or inspires you? and why?

What did you study to get where you are now?

What was the best piece of advice someone told/gave you?

Any advice or tips for someone like myself who is considering/starting a career in the graphic design industry?

And lastly do you think Modernism failed? if yes or not why?

Okay back to the very beginning

Action Plan -

History for all 3 movements comparing them
Political events / status
Each movements manifesto
Images of works relevant???

Then -

Narrow it down
Swiss History in depth
looking at individual Swiss artist's / designers
and their history in that movement

Okay I will do these steps first and from there I will figure out what's missing and what needs to be done.

Thoughts...

Hand in Monday 6th June 2011

aaarrrggghhhh.................


So much to do and not enough time :(
feel like giving up 
i need the motivation ok going uni this week from 9am til closing gna ask mum to pick up lil man from nursery. 

Next steps...

Narrow and pin point the important stuff 


Put what I know and so confidently talk about to practice i.e. sketches, development work get going really


Think more beyond the modernism aesthetics
So my next steps are to:


Delve more into the historical and political 


Look at each movements Manifesto's and perhaps write my own and live by it for a week?


Look more in depth at the artists I like so maybe it gives a clearer image


List questions I could ask.


Next meeting Thursday 19th May 2011
Group crit
Hopefully have the blog fully loaded with research and that also list question I would like to ask or email the professionals


Thursday 26th may 2011
Another Group crit (groups of 4 people)
Would like to have some development work by this stage so the next week is just finalising and printing.